Skip to main content

ANU Centre for European Studies

  • Home
  • About
  • People
    • Directors
    • Professional staff
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Past visitors
    • Associates
    • Students
      • Current PhD students
      • Past PhD students
      • Interns
  • Events
    • Event series
  • News
  • Highlights
  • Publications
    • Briefing Papers
    • Policy Notes
    • Centre Newsletters
    • Occasional Papers
    • Konrad Adenauer Lecture Papers
    • Working Papers
  • Jean Monnet activities
    • Algorithmic Futures Policy Lab
    • Culture in International Relations: Europe and the Indo-Pacific
    • EU Climate Change Agenda & External Trade and Investment
    • Implementing Climate Policies
    • Liberal Democracy in Action
    • Remembering Across Continents: European Politics of Memory from Australian Perspectives
    • EU Migration & Integration Network
    • Centre of Excellence for EU - Australia Economic Cooperation
    • Third Country Engagement with EU Trade Policy
    • EU - Australia Trade in Services
    • Energy Policy Workshop
    • Water Policy Innovation Hub
    • Europa Policy Labs
    • Understanding Geographical Indications
    • Understanding EU Trade: Stakeholder Training
    • Leadership Emerging from Migration Ethnicity Race and Gender in Australia and the EU
  • Past projects
  • Fellowships
  • Links
  • Contact us

Related Sites

  • Gifts and donations
  • Research School of Social Sciences

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomePublicationsBalancing Exclusion, Prosecution and Non-refoulement: The Application of Article 1F of The Refugees Convention In The Netherlands
Balancing exclusion, prosecution and non-refoulement: the application of article 1F of the Refugees Convention in The Netherlands
Balancing exclusion, prosecution and non-refoulement: the application of article 1F of the Refugees Convention in The Netherlands
Author/editor: Deciana Speckmann
Year published: 2011
Issue no.: 1
Volume no.: 2

Abstract

As the “legal capital of the world” and host of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Dutch government has consistently advocated that crimes under international law should not go unpunished.  Hence, it is not surprising that the Netherlands has become a frequent invoker of Article 1F of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugees Convention), which denies refugee status to perpetrators of particularly serious international crimes.  In an attempt to go beyond excluding such individuals from refugee protection, the Dutch government has made serious efforts towards prosecuting them. By rigorously applying Article 1F and by making criminal prosecution an inherent component of the post-exclusion phase, the Netherlands considers itself a progressive frontrunner in this field.  Indeed, as this essay will show, the Dutch approach to exclusion is ahead of its time.

File attachments

AttachmentSize
2011-1_BPS-exclusion-in-the-Netherlands-Speckmann.pdf(985.01 KB)985.01 KB